Promoting and Protecting Press Freedom & Freedom Of Expression In Nigeria

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Archives

 
 

Nigerians Score Obasanjo Low On Security

 

Lagos, Thursday January 7, 2002:  Pointing to the spate of politically motivated killings, ethno-religious crises, and other forms of unrest and violence that have characterized President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration, since inception, Nigerians have rated the administration’s performance in security lives and properties as a failure, and blamed it on the bad economic situation in the country.

 

Nigerian who described the present security situation in the country as a “time bomb”, said it portends danger for the year 2003 elections, while noting that there are indications that political maturity and tolerance are yet to be firmly rooted.  This, they said, could truncate the democratic experiment.

 

However, they suggested that the government should address the issue of unemployment, poverty and ignorance, as these would ensure the depletion of the army of restive citizens and hired assassins, and improve the security situation in the country.

 

These were the opinion of most Nigerian in a public poll recently conducted by Media Rights Agenda under its Executive Watch project.  The survey was conducted in eight cities in various geo-political regions of the country.  The cities include Lagos, Ibadan, Benin City, Enugu, Port Harcourt, Kaduna, Kano and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.  It polled Nigerians of various works of life from the age of 18 years, irrespective of the educational qualification.

 

Recalling Nigeria’s return to democratic rule on May 29, 1999, which is generally considered a mile stone achievement, is being threatened because of insecurity to lives and properties arising from a spate of politically motivated killings, ethno-religious crises and other forms of unrest and violence.

 

Almost every part of the country is affected: from the political violence in Osun, Ebonyi, and Bayelsa states; the bloody ethnic clashes in Nasarawa, Plateau, Benue and Taraba states; and religious riots in Kaduna and Kano states.  Till date, it is estimated that about 2,000 people have been killed and properties worth billion of naira destroyed.

In a recent meeting with the Federal Executives, comprising the heads if the nation’s security outfits, President Obasanjo ordered the overhaul of the security system of the nation as a first step in restoring peace and order in the nation.

 

The study had four questions:

 

To ask respondents, to rate President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration in terms of its constitutional responsibility to security of lives and properties?

 

To inquire further from respondents whose rating in negative, what factor in their views contributed to the said poor performances of the government in this area?

 

To seek the view of respondents on what impact the state of insecurity currently in the country could have on the 2003 elections?

 

To inquire from respondents their prescription on how to curb the wanton destruction of lives and properties those have characterized President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration?

 

Out of the 8,000 copies of questionnaire administered, 7,261 were filled and retuned.  This shows a return rate of 90.8 per cent and a mortality rate of 9.2 per cent.

 

Regarding the question that asked respondents to rate President Obasanjo’s administration performance in terms of its constitutional responsibility to secure the lives and properties of Nigerians, the response pattern shows that 4,739 (65.3%) respondents out of the total of 7,261, rated it ‘Bad’, 2,662 (56.2%) said it is ‘Fair’, while 1.129 (15.%) others said it is ‘Good’.

 

Probing further, question asked respondents who rated the performance of President Obasanjo’s administration on security as ‘Bad, to state the factors that contributed most to it.  One thousand four hundred and three respondents (29.6% blamed it on political immaturity and intolerance, 2.662 (56.2% said unemployment, poverty and ignorance, while 514 (10.8%) others said neglect of national security by successive governments.

 

Asked what respondents think the current state of insecurity would impact on the year 2003 elections, the general view was that it is a “time bomb” that portends danger in form of political upheaval and violence to the nascent democracy, and it could provide the military and excuse to seize power.

 

On measures to curb the wanton destruction of lives and properties, 4,170 (57.4%) respondents suggested that government should address the issue of unemployment, poverty and ignorance; 2,237 (30.8%) suggested that adequate punishment should be melted to identified culprits; while 730 (10.1%) other suggested that the society should be restructured to guarantee equal opportunity for all.  One hundred and twenty four others were undecided.

 

                                                                                   Contact:

                                                                                    Ademoyewa Johnson

                                                                                    Campaigns Officer

                                                                                    Tel/Fax: 01-4930831

                                                                                    E-mail: pubs@mediarightsagenda.org

Coalitions

Partners

 

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Archives